Apparently DA is on a "childs show porn movement" which basicly DA saying no to cartoon characters from "children's cartoon shows" be drawn in the nude, or even in tasteful pictures such as in bikinis...

This also includes "aged up" characters, where young characters are drawn into a "legal" age group.

It seems that the jackasses who run deviant art (which I will refer to as Devious Art Nazis) associate with pedophilia...

But how can that be?

"Oh, these characters are depicted as underage, and anyone who desires an underage toon is considered a pedophile."

Well, lets see here... The last time I checked, underage cartoons are still legal and classified as "lolicon" which, I've never been a fan of it myself. But surely it creates no harm to anyone but the "fapper" from masturbating too much...

And to be legally labeled as a pedophile, one must be partaking in actual child pornography which most of the "underage artists" are whole heartedly against. (So am I)

But this just isn't enough... Is DA sure that they are trying to cut down on pedophilia? Or are they on a personal vendetta, set out to rid their site of good material?

Watch out furries, we are next! Before you know it DA will somehow link anthro art with beastiality....